Maryland Casualty Co. v. Freeman

Ninth Circuit

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Freeman

71 F.2d 1011, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3341

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 11, 1934

DocketNo. 7515

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 71 F.2d 1011 (Maryland Casualty Co. v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Freeman, 71 F.2d 1011, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3341 (9th Cir. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After oral arguments, upon motion to dismiss appeal, ordered appeal in above cause dismissed upon the authority of Chatfield et al. v. O’Dwyer et al, 101 F. 797; Foreman v. Burleigh, 109 F. 313; In re Lewensohn, 121 F. 538; Ohio Valley Bank v. Mack, 163 F. 155; In re Chakos, 24 F.(2d) 482; Amick v. Mortgage Sec. Corp., 30 F.(2d) 359; Johnson v. Barney, 53 [1012]*1012F.(2d) 770; In re Patterson-McDonald Ship Building Company, 288 F. 546, and that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After oral arguments, upon motion to dismiss appeal, ordered appeal in above cause dismissed upon the authority of Chatfield et al. v. O’Dwyer et al, 101 F. 797; Foreman v. Burleigh, 109 F. 313; In re Lewensohn, 121 F. 538; Ohio Valley Bank v. Mack, 163 F. 155; In re Chakos, 24 F.(2d) 482; Amick v. Mortgage Sec. Corp., 30 F.(2d) 359; Johnson v. Barney, 53 [1012]*1012F.(2d) 770; In re Patterson-McDonald Ship Building Company, 288 F. 546, and that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 F.2d 1011, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maryland-casualty-co-v-freeman-ca9-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack