Maryland Casualty Co. v. First Nat. Bank

Fifth Circuit

Maryland Casualty Co. v. First Nat. Bank

80 F.2d 274, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3259

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 4, 1935

DocketNo. 7819

StatusPublished

This text of 80 F.2d 274 (Maryland Casualty Co. v. First Nat. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maryland Casualty Co. v. First Nat. Bank, 80 F.2d 274, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3259 (5th Cir. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PER curiam:.

The judgment appealed from is a general judgment for defendants. The cause was tried on a jury waiver submitting all matters of fact as well as of law to the court. There was no motion for judgment; neither is the evidence brought up by bill of exceptions.

In this state of the record, nothing is presented for review. Law v. United States, 266 U.S. 494, 45 S.Ct. 175, 69 L. Ed. 401; Fleischmann Const. Co. v. United States, 270 U.S. 349, 46 S.Ct. 284, 70 L.Ed. 624; Bank of Waterproof v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. (C.C.A.) 299 F. 478; Keith Lumber Co. v. Houston Oil Co. (C.C.A.) 257 F. 1; Heinz v. Commissioner (C.C.A.) 70 F.(2d) 461.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER curiam:.

The judgment appealed from is a general judgment for defendants. The cause was tried on a jury waiver submitting all matters of fact as well as of law to the court. There was no motion for judgment; neither is the evidence brought up by bill of exceptions.

In this state of the record, nothing is presented for review. Law v. United States, 266 U.S. 494, 45 S.Ct. 175, 69 L. Ed. 401; Fleischmann Const. Co. v. United States, 270 U.S. 349, 46 S.Ct. 284, 70 L.Ed. 624; Bank of Waterproof v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. (C.C.A.) 299 F. 478; Keith Lumber Co. v. Houston Oil Co. (C.C.A.) 257 F. 1; Heinz v. Commissioner (C.C.A.) 70 F.(2d) 461.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 F.2d 274, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maryland-casualty-co-v-first-nat-bank-ca5-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack