Maryland Casualty Co. v. First Nat. Bank

80 F.2d 274, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3259
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Maryland Casualty Co. v. First Nat. Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 82 F.2d 465
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 4, 1935·No. No. 7819·Published

Opinion

PER curiam:.

The judgment appealed from is a general judgment for defendants. The cause was tried on a jury waiver submitting all matters of fact as well as of law to the court. There was no motion for judgment; neither is the evidence brought up by bill of exceptions.

In this state of the record, nothing is presented for review. Law v. United States, 266 U.S. 494, 45 S.Ct. 175, 69 L. Ed. 401; Fleischmann Const. Co. v. United States, 270 U.S. 349, 46 S.Ct. 284, 70 L.Ed. 624; Bank of Waterproof v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. (C.C.A.) 299 F. 478; Keith Lumber Co. v. Houston Oil Co. (C.C.A.) 257 F. 1; Heinz v. Commissioner (C.C.A.) 70 F.(2d) 461.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maryland Casualty Co. v. First Nat. Bank, 80 F.2d 274, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3259 (5th Cir. 1935).

80 F.2d 274 (Maryland Casualty Co. v. First Nat. Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Law v. United States
266 U.S. 494 (Supreme Court, 1925)
Heinz v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
70 F.2d 461 (Fifth Circuit, 1934)
Keith Lumber Co. v. Houston Oil Co. of Texas
257 F. 1 (Fifth Circuit, 1919)
Bank of Waterproof v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
299 F. 478 (Fifth Circuit, 1924)