Mary Murray v. Bej Minerals, LLC

920 F.3d 583
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 4, 2019
Docket16-35506
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 920 F.3d 583 (Mary Murray v. Bej Minerals, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mary Murray v. Bej Minerals, LLC, 920 F.3d 583 (9th Cir. 2019).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARY ANN MURRAY; LIGE M. No. 16-35506 MURRAY, D.C. No. 1:14-cv-00106-SPW Plaintiffs-Counter- District of Montana, Defendants-Appellees, Billings

v. ORDER

BEJ MINERALS, LLC; RTWF, LLC,

Defendants-Counter- Claimants-Appellants.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be

cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges McKeown, Miller and Bade did not participate in the deliberations or

vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

(PS) Aderholt v. Edwards
E.D. California, 2023
Murray v. BEJ Minerals, LLC
924 F.3d 1070 (Ninth Circuit, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
920 F.3d 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-murray-v-bej-minerals-llc-ca9-2019.