Mary Lynn Kantara Gerke v. Jamil James Kantara

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mary Lynn Kantara Gerke v. Jamil James Kantara. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 4099
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 5, 2015·No. 01-14-00082-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 01-14-00082-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/5/2015 2:36:39 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK

NO. 01-14-00082-CV

FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/5/2015 2:36:39 PM IN THE COURT OF APPEALS CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MARY LYNN KANTARA GERKE V. JAMIL “JAMES” KANTARA

APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEE’S REPLY BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

Appellee Jamil “James” Kantara (herein after “James”) files this Appellee’s

Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellee’s Reply Brief under Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure 10.5(b) and 38.6(d). James respectfully requests a 30-day

extension to file Appellee’s reply brief to Appellant’s Brief of Appellant. Appellee

requests the 30-day extension begin on the first day after the latter of this Court’s ruling on Appellee’s Motion to Strike Brief of Appellant Filed on January 12, 2015

and this Court’s Notice To Dismiss For Want Of Jurisdiction on January 27, 2015.

This is Appellee’s first request for an extension of time to file his brief.

I.

This is an appeal from an October 28, 2013 judgment signed by the Associate

Judge of the 311th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, denying in part

Appellant’s Mary Lynn Kantara Gerke’s (hereinafter “Mary”) petition to modify

parent-child relationship and granting in part Appellee’s counter-petition. On

November 25, 2013, Appellant filed a motion for new trial that was overruled by

operation of law and on January 24, 2014, Appellant filed a notice of appeal.

II.

An extension of time is necessary for the following reasons:

1. On December 9, 2014, Mary filed her Appellant’s Brief pro se.

2. On January 7, 2015, James filed Jamil “James” Kantara’s Reply Brief.

3. On January 12, 2015, Ms. Tomlinson, attorney for Mary, filed Brief of

Appellant. This court notified Appellee, Appellee’s brief was due on

February 11, 2015.

4. On January 16, 2015, James filed Appellee’s Motion to Strike Brief of

Appellant Filed on January 12, 2015.

-2- 5. On January 22, 2015, Mary filed Appellant’s Motion Requesting the

Court to Order Appellant’s Attorney to Rebrief Her Case.

6. On January 23, 2015, Ms. Tomlinson filed her Response to Appellee’s

Motion to Strike Brief of Appellant.

7. On January 23, 2015, James filed Appellee’s Response to Appellant’s

Response to Appellee’s Motion to Strike Brief of Appellant.

8. On January 27, 2015, this Court issued its Notice To Dismiss For Want

Of Jurisdiction unless a response is received by February 10, 2015.

III.

Accordingly, Appellee requests a 30-day extension of time to file Appellee’s

reply brief after this Court rules on Appellee’s Motion to Strike Brief of Appellant

Filed on January 12, 2015 and this Court’s Notice To Dismiss For Want Of

Jurisdiction filed on January 27, 2014. This Motion is not filed for the purpose of

delay but so that Appellee can determine whether an Appellee’s brief is warranted

at this time.

IV.

For these reasons, Appellee Jamil “James” Kantara respectfully requests that

the Court grant this motion and extend the time for filing his reply brief.

-3- Respectfully submitted,

Wilfried P. Schmitz & Associates, P.C.

/s/ Wilfried Schmitz BY: _________________________ Wilfried P. Schmitz Texas Bar No. 17778700 17040 El Camino Real, Suite 400 Houston, Texas 77058 Phone: (281) 486-5066 Email: Court_Documents@schmitzlaw.com Attorney for Jamil “James” Kantara

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE In accordance with Rule 10.1(a)(5) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, I certify that I contacted counsel concerning the filing of this Appellee’s Motion For Extension Of Time To File Appellee’s Reply Brief. The undersigned has not yet received a reply and cannot state at this time whether counsel is unopposed.

/s/ Wilfried Schmitz Wilfried P. Schmitz

-4- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Appellee’s Motion For Extension Of Time To File Appellee’s Reply Brief has this 5th day of February, 2015, been sent pursuant to T.R.A.P. 9.5 (b)(1) by electronic mail, to the following:

Ashley Tomlinson 1800 Saint James Place, Suite 620 Houston, TX 77056 eserviceavt@dalefamilylaw.com

Douglas York 3355 W. Alabama, Suite 100 Houston, Texas 77098 york@douglasyork.com via E-File

-5-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mary Lynn Kantara Gerke v. Jamil James Kantara, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Mary Lynn Kantara Gerke v. Jamil James Kantara (Mary Lynn Kantara Gerke v. Jamil James Kantara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.