Mary Lynn Kantara Gerke v. Jamil James Kantara

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-14-00082-CV Style: Mary Lynn Kantara Gerke v. Jamil James Kantara Date motion filed*: March 28, 2014 and April 4, 2014 Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief and Supplement to Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: N/A Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: N/A Date Requested: April 28, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant timely requested preparation of a clerk’s record and designated additional documents for inclusion in the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(a), (b). The clerk’s record, filed with this Court on February 26, 2014, omits copies of documents required under rule Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(a). Accordingly, the appellate record is not complete, and appellant’s brief is not yet due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellant’s motion and supplement to motion, therefore, are dismissed as moot.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: April 15, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision