Mary Guzman Tello v. State
This text of Mary Guzman Tello v. State (Mary Guzman Tello v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 21, 2009.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-09-00334-CR
MARY GUZMAN TELLO, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 361st District Court
Brazos County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 08-02071-CRF-361
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
According to information provided to this Court, appellant entered a plea agreement with the State on December 10, 2008, and she filed a notice of appeal the same day. On April 30, 2009, the Brazos County District Clerk=s office advised this Court that no judgment has been entered in this case.
Generally, an appellate court only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where there has been a final judgment of conviction. Workman v. State, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961). In addition, a notice of appeal in a criminal case is not effective when filed before the trial court makes a finding of guilt. See Tex. R. App. P. 27.1(b).
On May 1, 2009, this Court notified the parties that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction unless a response was filed in ten days demonstrating that we have jurisdiction over this appeal. No response was filed.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Frost.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mary Guzman Tello v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mary-guzman-tello-v-state-texapp-2009.