Marx v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 883
United States Customs Court·Decided April 25, 1967·No. No. P67/121; protest 326711-K (New York); No. P67/119; protests 62/18615, etc. (Cleveland); No. P67/120; protests 64/16799, etc. (Los Angeles); No. P67/121; protests 64/16812 and 64/16849 (Los Angeles); No. P67/122; protest 66/2747 (New York)·Published
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools, Inc. v. United States (49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marx v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 883 (cusc 1967).
58 Cust. Ct. 883 (Marx v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.