Marx v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Marx v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 880, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1893

United States Customs Court·Decided April 13, 1967·No. No. P67/107; protests 64/15132, etc. (San Francisco)·Published

Opinion

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “B” or “C” covered by the foregoing protests [881]*881consists of HO equipment similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. Polk's Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al. (47 CCPA 137, C.A.D. 746), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

(Note : The following protests were decided by a special first division consisting of OliveR, WatsoN, and Rao, Judges.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “B” or “C” covered by the foregoing protests [881]*881consists of HO equipment similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. Polk's Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al. (47 CCPA 137, C.A.D. 746), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

(Note : The following protests were decided by a special first division consisting of OliveR, WatsoN, and Rao, Judges.)

Marx v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 880, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1893 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

58 Cust. Ct. 880 (Marx v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.