Marx v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Marx v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 880, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1893

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 13, 1967

DocketNo. P67/107; protests 64/15132, etc. (San Francisco)

StatusPublished

This text of 58 Cust. Ct. 880 (Marx v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marx v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 880, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1893 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “B” or “C” covered by the foregoing protests [881]*881consists of HO equipment similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. Polk's Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al. (47 CCPA 137, C.A.D. 746), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

(Note : The following protests were decided by a special first division consisting of OliveR, WatsoN, and Rao, Judges.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “B” or “C” covered by the foregoing protests [881]*881consists of HO equipment similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. Polk's Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al. (47 CCPA 137, C.A.D. 746), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

(Note : The following protests were decided by a special first division consisting of OliveR, WatsoN, and Rao, Judges.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 Cust. Ct. 880, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marx-v-united-states-cusc-1967.