Martsay Bolder, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Bill Armontrout, Appellant/cross-Appellee

928 F.2d 806, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4511, 1991 WL 38182
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 21, 1991
Docket89-2323, 89-2324
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 928 F.2d 806 (Martsay Bolder, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Bill Armontrout, Appellant/cross-Appellee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martsay Bolder, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Bill Armontrout, Appellant/cross-Appellee, 928 F.2d 806, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4511, 1991 WL 38182 (8th Cir. 1991).

Opinions

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.

The suggestion for rehearing en banc has been considered by the court and is denied by reason of the lack of majority of active judges voting to rehear the case en banc. Chief Judge Lay, Judge McMillian, Judge Arnold, Judge John R. Gibson and Judge Loken dissent from the denial of the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The petition for rehearing is also denied.

The present stay of execution shall continue until the time has expired for petitioner to seek certiorari review with the Supreme Court of the United States. If a timely petition for certiorari is filed then the stay shall continue until such time as the Supreme Court disposes of the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martsay Bolder v. Bill Armontrout
983 F.2d 98 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)
Kenneth L. Kenley v. Bill Armontrout
937 F.2d 1298 (Eighth Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
928 F.2d 806, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4511, 1991 WL 38182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martsay-bolder-appelleecross-appellant-v-bill-armontrout-ca8-1991.