Marton v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Marton v. Davis

8 A.D.3d 1042, 778 N.Y.S.2d 334, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8246

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.3d 1042 (Marton v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marton v. Davis, 8 A.D.3d 1042, 778 N.Y.S.2d 334, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8246 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Peter C. Bradstreet, A.J.), entered January 15, 2003. The order denied defendant-petitioner’s application for a permanent injunction and to hold plaintiff-respondent in contempt and denied without prejudice plaintiff-respondent’s motion for leave to reargue and reopen a prior proceeding.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984 [1990]) and the order is affirmed without costs. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Peter C. Bradstreet, A.J.), entered January 15, 2003. The order denied defendant-petitioner’s application for a permanent injunction and to hold plaintiff-respondent in contempt and denied without prejudice plaintiff-respondent’s motion for leave to reargue and reopen a prior proceeding.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984 [1990]) and the order is affirmed without costs. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.3d 1042, 778 N.Y.S.2d 334, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marton-v-davis-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack