Martinucci v. Martinucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Martinucci v. Martinucci

288 A.D.2d 444, 733 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11404

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 26, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 288 A.D.2d 444 (Martinucci v. Martinucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martinucci v. Martinucci, 288 A.D.2d 444, 733 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11404 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated November 29, 1999, which denied his motion to set the valuation date for the parties’ marital assets as the date of the commencement of a prior, dismissed divorce action.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, because the right of direct appeal from the order terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; Martinucci v Martinucci, 288 AD2d 444 [decided herewith]). Altman, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated November 29, 1999, which denied his motion to set the valuation date for the parties’ marital assets as the date of the commencement of a prior, dismissed divorce action.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, because the right of direct appeal from the order terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; Martinucci v Martinucci, 288 AD2d 444 [decided herewith]). Altman, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Townes, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 A.D.2d 444, 733 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinucci-v-martinucci-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack