Martinez v. Tuhy

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

QUINTANA JOE MARTINEZ, Case No. 25-cv-1958 (LMP/LIB)

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STEVEN TUHY,

Defendant.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), ECF No. 3, of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, which recommends dismissing Plaintiff Quintana Joe Martinez’s Complaint, ECF No. 1, without prejudice for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction. No objections have been filed to the R&R in the time period permitted, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (ECF No. 3) is ADOPTED; 2. Martinez’s complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: July 1, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge