Martinez v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2024 ND 185
Angelica Maria Cruz Martinez, Petitioner and Appellant v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20240064
Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable James D. Gion, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellant.
Amanda R. Engelstad, State’s Attorney, Dickinson, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
Martinez v. State No. 20240064
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Angelica Martinez appeals from a district court order denying her application for postconviction relief from the judgment. Martinez argues her attorney was ineffective as she failed to present mitigating evidence during her probation revocation hearing, resulting in the court resentencing her to seven years on her first probation violation.
[¶2] After review of the record, the judgment of the district court is supported by findings meeting the required standard of proof. We summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2024 ND 185 (Martinez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.