Martinez v. State
35 So. 3d 164, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7318, 2010 WL 2076977
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martinez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 965 So. 2d 1244 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Farinas v. State, 569 So.2d 425, 429 n. 7 (Fla.1990) (“It is well-established law that where the trial judge has extended counsel an opportunity to cure any error, and counsel fails to take *165 advantage of the opportunity, such error, if any, was invited and will not warrant reversal.”) (citation omitted).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martinez v. State, 35 So. 3d 164, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7318, 2010 WL 2076977 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
35 So. 3d 164 (Martinez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farinas v. State
569 So. 2d 425 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)