Martinez v. State

968 So. 2d 56, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15936, 2007 WL 2932841
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martinez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 933 So. 2d 1155
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 10, 2007·No. No. 1D06-4158·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Tanzi v. State, 964 So.2d 106 (Fla.2007) (“Because the.trial [57]*57court’s findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence in the record, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying [defendant’s] motion to withdraw his plea.”).

KAHN, PADOVANO, and HAWKE'S, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martinez v. State, 968 So. 2d 56, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15936, 2007 WL 2932841 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

968 So. 2d 56 (Martinez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tanzi v. State
964 So. 2d 106 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)