Martinez v. State
968 So. 2d 56, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15936, 2007 WL 2932841
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martinez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 933 So. 2d 1155 →
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Tanzi v. State, 964 So.2d 106 (Fla.2007) (“Because the.trial [57]*57court’s findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence in the record, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying [defendant’s] motion to withdraw his plea.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martinez v. State, 968 So. 2d 56, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15936, 2007 WL 2932841 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
968 So. 2d 56 (Martinez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tanzi v. State
964 So. 2d 106 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)