Martinez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Martinez v. State

904 So. 2d 473, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6477, 2005 WL 1027147

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 4, 2005

DocketNo. 3D05-529

StatusPublished

This text of 904 So. 2d 473 (Martinez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martinez v. State, 904 So. 2d 473, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6477, 2005 WL 1027147 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying defendant’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Defendant’s vindictive sentencing claim may not be raised in a motion to correct illegal sentence. See Gonzalez v. State, 897 So.2d 551 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Reese v. State, 896 So.2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Wright v. State, 891 So.2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Bouno v. State, 900 So.2d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying defendant’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Defendant’s vindictive sentencing claim may not be raised in a motion to correct illegal sentence. See Gonzalez v. State, 897 So.2d 551 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Reese v. State, 896 So.2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Wright v. State, 891 So.2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Bouno v. State, 900 So.2d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

904 So. 2d 473, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6477, 2005 WL 1027147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack