Martinez v. State
595 So. 2d 582, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3317, 1992 WL 57866
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martinez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 549 So. 2d 694 →
Opinion
We affirm the denial of Mr. Martinez’s motion to suppress. We strike condition 6 from the written order of probation because it does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing. Tillman v. State, 592 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). The written order of probation is otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martinez v. State, 595 So. 2d 582, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3317, 1992 WL 57866 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
595 So. 2d 582 (Martinez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tillman v. State
592 So. 2d 767 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)