Martinez v. State

564 So. 2d 270, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5355, 1990 WL 102711
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 25, 1990·No. No. 89-3009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and vacate that part of the trial court’s sentence which imposed a three-year mandatory minimum sentence for the defendant’s conviction of third-de[271]*271gree murder. The use of a firearm is not an essential element of third-degree murder and the jury did not, by interrogatory verdict, make a specific finding that appellant used a firearm in the commission of the murder. The state agrees that this part of the trial court’s sentence must be reversed on the authority of State v. Overfelt, 457 So.2d 1385 (Fla.1984) and Vause v. State, 502 So.2d 511 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

We affirm appellant’s conviction and the remainder of the sentence imposed by the trial court.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

LETTS and DELL, JJ., and FRANK, RICHARD H., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martinez v. State, 564 So. 2d 270, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5355, 1990 WL 102711 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

564 So. 2d 270 (Martinez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Letourneau v. Letourneau
564 So. 2d 270 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)