Martinez v. Reiner

104 A.D.3d 477, 961 N.Y.S.2d 116
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 12, 2013
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 104 A.D.3d 477 (Martinez v. Reiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez v. Reiner, 104 A.D.3d 477, 961 N.Y.S.2d 116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered September 26, 2011, which denied the motion of defendant Hunts Point Live Poultry and Slaughterhouse, Inc. to [478]*478vacate its default and for leave to serve its proposed verified answer, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.

The complaint, which was verified by counsel, was “purely hearsay, devoid of evidentiary value, and thus insufficient to support entry of a judgment pursuant to CPLR 3215” (Beltre v Babu, 32 AD3d 722, 723 [1st Dept 2006], citing Feffer v Malpeso, 210 AD2d 60, 61 [1st Dept 1994]; Joosten v Gale, 129 AD2d 531, 534-535 [1st Dept 1987]). In alleging only that plaintiff fell from a ladder while doing construction-related work, plaintiffs affidavit failed to provide the motion court with evidence sufficient to satisfy the court as to the prima facie validity of defendant’s liability for the stated claims (see Manhattan Telecom. Corp. v H & A Locksmith, Inc., 82 AD3d 674, 674 [1st Dept 2011], citing Feffer, 210 AD2d at 61; Giordano v Berisha, 45 AD3d 416 [1st Dept 2007]; CPLR 3215 [f]). Accordingly, the default order entered was a nullity (see Natradeze v Rubin, 33 AD3d 535 [1st Dept 2006]), and defendant’s remaining contentions, including its claim that it demonstrated a reasonable excuse for its default and a meritorious defense, need not be reached. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boutov v. Hanson
2026 NY Slip Op 31058(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2026)
Corvera v. Ritz
2026 NY Slip Op 30755(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2026)
Jones v. Greuner
2025 NY Slip Op 30058(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
Maisano v. Amsterdam Nursing Home Corp.
2024 NY Slip Op 33592(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Jun Gao v. Coconut Beach/Haw., LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 50784(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Carpio v. 700 Third Ave. Assoc., LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 31971(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Gross v. Hearing Better for Life, LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 50530(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Bellino v. Doromet, Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 50502(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Forest Walnut LLC v. Abizker
2024 NY Slip Op 30380(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
American Transit Insurance v. Curry
45 Misc. 3d 171 (New York Supreme Court, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 A.D.3d 477, 961 N.Y.S.2d 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-reiner-nyappdiv-2013.