Martinez v. Miller

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 7, 2025·No. 1:23-cv-01281·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OMARMARTINEZ, SSS

Petitioner, -against- 23 CIVIL 1281 (LIL) JUDGMENT SUPERINTENDENT MARK T. MILLER, Respondent. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated July 2, 2025, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf, Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). Dated: New York, New York July 7, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court BY: □□ MANGO Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martinez v. Miller, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Martinez v. Miller (Martinez v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)