Martinez v. Leinster

568 So. 2d 1013, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8363, 1990 WL 165355
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 1, 1990
DocketNo. 90-573
StatusPublished

This text of 568 So. 2d 1013 (Martinez v. Leinster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez v. Leinster, 568 So. 2d 1013, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8363, 1990 WL 165355 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge.

The plaintiff-appellant seeks review of a non-final order refusing to require his transportation at state expense from prison and abating his civil case against his former attorney until he is released and is able to appear at trial on his own. We treat this unauthorized appeal, see Fla.R. App.P. 9.130, as an application for certiora-ri and, upon the conclusion that the trial court did not abuse its discretion, deny that relief. See Price v. Johnston, 334 U.S. 266, 68 S.Ct. 1049, 92 L.Ed. 1356 (1948); Stone v. Morris, 546 F.2d 730 (7th Cir.1976); Kirk v. United States, 589 F.Supp. 808 (E.D.Va.1984).

CERTIORARI DENIED.

COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Price v. Johnston
334 U.S. 266 (Supreme Court, 1948)
Kirk v. United States
589 F. Supp. 808 (E.D. Virginia, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
568 So. 2d 1013, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8363, 1990 WL 165355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-leinster-fladistctapp-1990.