Martinez v. Leinster
Opinion
The plaintiff-appellant seeks review of a non-final order refusing to require his transportation at state expense from prison and abating his civil case against his former attorney until he is released and is able to appear at trial on his own. We treat this unauthorized appeal, see Fla.R. App.P. 9.130, as an application for certiora-ri and, upon the conclusion that the trial court did not abuse its discretion, deny that relief. See Price v. Johnston, 334 U.S. 266, 68 S.Ct. 1049, 92 L.Ed. 1356 (1948); Stone v. Morris, 546 F.2d 730 (7th Cir.1976); Kirk v. United States, 589 F.Supp. 808 (E.D.Va.1984).
CERTIORARI DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
568 So. 2d 1013 (Martinez v. Leinster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.