Martinez v. Leinster

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Martinez v. Leinster

538 So. 2d 986, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 580, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1014, 1989 WL 16660

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 2, 1989

DocketNo. 88-812

StatusPublished

This text of 538 So. 2d 986 (Martinez v. Leinster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martinez v. Leinster, 538 So. 2d 986, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 580, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1014, 1989 WL 16660 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a cause of action for failure “to properly follow the Rules of Civil Procedure.” Because the record before us discloses that appellant sufficiently, although inartfully, attempted to have his case set for trial and otherwise followed the rules of civil procedure we quash the order of dismissal and remand the matter for trial.

ORDER QUASHED; REMANDED.

SHARP, C.J., and DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a cause of action for failure “to properly follow the Rules of Civil Procedure.” Because the record before us discloses that appellant sufficiently, although inartfully, attempted to have his case set for trial and otherwise followed the rules of civil procedure we quash the order of dismissal and remand the matter for trial.

ORDER QUASHED; REMANDED.

SHARP, C.J., and DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

538 So. 2d 986, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 580, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1014, 1989 WL 16660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-leinster-fladistctapp-1989.