Martinez v. Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement
This text of 124 F. App'x 806 (Martinez v. Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rolando Martinez appeals a district court judgment and order summarily dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. The district court denied relief because the holding in Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 121 S.Ct. 2491, 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001), did not apply to inadmissible aliens like Martinez. In Clark v. Martinez, — U.S. — , 125 S.Ct. 716, 160 L.Ed.2d 734 (2005), the Supreme Court held the holding in Zadvydas did apply to inadmissible aliens. Accordingly, we vacate the district court judgment and remand for further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 F. App'x 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-bureau-of-immigration-customs-enforcement-ca4-2005.