Martinez v. Anderson County, TX

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:22-cv-00171 Cristian Martinez et al., Plaintiffs, V. Anderson County et al., Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiffs filed this action asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. On March 1, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a re- port recommending that plaintiffs’ renewed motion for class certifi- cation be granted as modified. Doc. 83. No party filed written objec- tions. When a party fails to object to a magistrate judge’s report, the court reviews the record only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satis- fied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. The court grants the renewed motion for class cer- tification as modified to include only the two proposed main classes. So ordered by the court on March 28, 2023. faked BARKER United States District Judge