Martinez, Ex Parte Raymond D.
This text of Martinez, Ex Parte Raymond D. (Martinez, Ex Parte Raymond D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On March 22, 2006, applicant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071, § 5, and a motion for stay of execution. On March 24, 2006, this Court granted the stay and found that the application satisfied the requirements of Article 11.071, § 5(a).
Further, the Court filed and set applicant's case to address the single issue raised in his application: whether the nullification issue the jury received in the punishment phase of applicant's trial suffered from the same defects that the United States Supreme Court found unconstitutional in Penry v. Johnson, 532 U.S. 782 (2001)(Penry II), and Smith v. Texas, 543 U.S. 37 (2004). The parties are ordered to brief the merits of this issue in light of the entire charge that the jury received. Applicant's brief is due in this Court within 30 days after the date of this order, and the State's brief is due in this Court within 30 days after the date applicant files his brief. Oral argument will be permitted upon request.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 5th DAY OF April, 2006.
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Martinez, Ex Parte Raymond D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-ex-parte-raymond-d-texcrimapp-2006.