Martin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Martin v. State

926 S.W.2d 548, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1342, 1996 WL 422038

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 339 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 30, 1996·No. No. 69395·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Martin v. State, 926 S.W.2d 548, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1342, 1996 WL 422038 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

926 S.W.2d 548 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.