Martin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Martin v. State

864 S.W.2d 19, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1614, 1993 WL 412980

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 339 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 1993·No. No. 63311·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Martin v. State, 864 S.W.2d 19, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1614, 1993 WL 412980 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

864 S.W.2d 19 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.