Martin v. State

115 N.E.3d 1272
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided January 25, 2019·No. Court of Appeals Case No. 29A04-1712-CR-2992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana

This matter has come before the Indiana Supreme Court on a petition to transfer jurisdiction, filed pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rules 56(B) and 57, following the issuance of a decision by the Court of Appeals. The Court has reviewed the decision of the Court of Appeals, and the submitted record on appeal, all briefs filed in the Court of Appeals, and all materials filed in connection with the request to transfer jurisdiction have been made available to the Court for review. Each participating member has had the opportunity to voice that Justice's views on the case in conference with the other Justices, and each participating member of the Court has voted on the petition.

Being duly advised, the Court DENIES the petition to transfer.

David, J., Massa, J., and Slaughter, J., vote to deny transfer.

Rush, C.J., dissents from the denial of transfer with separate opinion in which Goff, J., joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 115 N.E.3d 1272 (Ind. 2019).

115 N.E.3d 1272 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related