Martin v. State

328 S.E.2d 573, 173 Ga. App. 837, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 2685
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 185 Ga. App. 145
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 13, 1985·No. 69706·Published

Opinion

Sognier, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of escape from confinement. His attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which he considered could arguably support an appeal. We are in agreement with counsel that none of the points raised, though persuasively presented, have any merit. Therefore, we granted the motion to withdraw. In addition, we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law. We have found none. We are satisfied that the evidence produced at trial [838]*838was sufficient to authorize any rational trier of fact to find appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes charged. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528).

Decided March 13, 1985. Dupont K. Cheney, District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 328 S.E.2d 573, 173 Ga. App. 837, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 2685 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985).

328 S.E.2d 573 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Jackson v. Virginia
443 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Baldwin v. State
264 S.E.2d 528 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)