Martin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Martin v. State

289 S.E.2d 560, 161 Ga. App. 752, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3084

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 19, 1982

Docket63293

StatusPublished

This text of 289 S.E.2d 560 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. State, 289 S.E.2d 560, 161 Ga. App. 752, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3084 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Shulman, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the burglary of a convenience grocery store and brings this appeal, citing four enumerations of error which are totally without merit. One enumeration objects to the use of bloodhounds by the police (the dogs tracked appellant from the burglary site to his mother’s home), and two other alleged errors involve inconsequential portions of the testimony of state witnesses. The last enumeration is without support in the record and therefore cannot be considered by this court. We have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors. We have found none and are satisfied that the evidence produced at trial was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find appellant guilty of burglary beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shulman, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the burglary of a convenience grocery store and brings this appeal, citing four enumerations of error which are totally without merit. One enumeration objects to the use of bloodhounds by the police (the dogs tracked appellant from the burglary site to his mother’s home), and two other alleged errors involve inconsequential portions of the testimony of state witnesses. The last enumeration is without support in the record and therefore cannot be considered by this court. We have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors. We have found none and are satisfied that the evidence produced at trial was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find appellant guilty of burglary beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 S.E.2d 560, 161 Ga. App. 752, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-state-gactapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack