Martin v. State

233 S.E.2d 38, 141 Ga. App. 181, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1823

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 2, 1977·No. 53316·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

Defendant was convicted of aggravated sodomy. Held:

1. No objection was made at trial to the in-court identification of defendant. Absent an objection, defendant will not be heard to complain on appeal that this in-court identification was tainted by prior improper out-of-court identification procedures. Johnson v. State, 128 Ga. App. 69 (1) (195 SE2d 676).

2. There is no merit in the contention that defendant was denied due process on the ground that the state knowingly used the perjured testimony of the victim.

3. The evidence authorized the conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Chief Judge.

Defendant was convicted of aggravated sodomy. Held:

2. There is no merit in the contention that defendant was denied due process on the ground that the state knowingly used the perjured testimony of the victim.

3. The evidence authorized the conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray and Smith, JJ., concur.

Martin v. State, 233 S.E.2d 38, 141 Ga. App. 181, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1823 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

233 S.E.2d 38 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Stripling v. State

271 S.E.2d 888 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)

Griffin v. State

265 S.E.2d 101 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)

Moore v. State

246 S.E.2d 740 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)

Opinion

3. The evidence authorized the conviction.

Related