Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Martin v. State

Martin v. State

233 S.E.2d 38, 141 Ga. App. 181, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1823
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 2, 1977
Docket53316
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 233 S.E.2d 38 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. State, 233 S.E.2d 38, 141 Ga. App. 181, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1823 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

Defendant was convicted of aggravated sodomy. Held:

1. No objection was made at trial to the in-court identification of defendant. Absent an objection, defendant will not be heard to complain on appeal that this in-court identification was tainted by prior improper out-of-court identification procedures. Johnson v. State, 128 Ga. App. 69 (1) (195 SE2d 676).

2. There is no merit in the contention that defendant was denied due process on the ground that the state knowingly used the perjured testimony of the victim.

3. The evidence authorized the conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stripling v. State
271 S.E.2d 888 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Griffin v. State
265 S.E.2d 101 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Moore v. State
246 S.E.2d 740 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 S.E.2d 38, 141 Ga. App. 181, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-state-gactapp-1977.