Martin v. State

158 S.E. 803, 43 Ga. App. 334, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 343
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 13, 1931·No. 21372·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Bloodwoktii, J.

Under the answer of the judge of the criminal court of Atlanta to the writ of certiorari, which is neither excepted to nor traversed, and must be accepted as conclusive, the certiorari was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Lu,ke, J., eoneur. Eldon Haldane, for plaintiff in error. John 8. McClelland, solicitor, John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 158 S.E. 803, 43 Ga. App. 334, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 343 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

158 S.E. 803 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ronemous v. State
74 S.E.2d 676 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Mons v. State
66 S.E.2d 159 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Hughes v. State
17 S.E.2d 189 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Fudge v. State
16 S.E.2d 892 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Beavers v. Cassells
192 S.E. 249 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Crymes v. State
182 S.E. 856 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)