Martin v. State

87 S.E. 715, 17 Ga. App. 516, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 740
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 20, 1916·No. 6950·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Wade, J.

1. The guilt or innocence of the accused in this case depended entirely upon circumstantial evidence, and it was therefore obligatory upon the trial judge, even in the absence of a timely written request, to charge the jury as to the force and effect of circumstantial evidence in criminal cases. Weaver v. State, 135 Ga. 317, 320 (69 S. E. 488), and cases there cited.

2. The trial judge therefore erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 87 S.E. 715, 17 Ga. App. 516, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 740 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

87 S.E. 715 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. State
90 S.E. 370 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)