Martin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Martin v. State

86 S.E. 945, 17 Ga. App. 372, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 425

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 19, 1915

Docket6871

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 86 S.E. 945 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. State, 86 S.E. 945, 17 Ga. App. 372, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 425 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. The uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice is sufficient to convict in- a misdemeanor case. Penal Code (1910), § 1017; Parsons v. State, 43 Ga. 197; Crisson v. State, 51 Ga. 597; Porter v. State, 76 Ga. 658; Rountree v. State, 88 Ga. 457 (14 S. E. 712); Stone v. State, 118 Ga. 705 (5), 713 (45 S. E. 630, 98 Am. St. R. 145); Gamble v. State, 4 Ga. App. 845 (62 S. E. 544); Brooks v. State, 12 Ga. App. 693 (78 S. E. 143).

2. The evidence authorized the judgment of the court, sitting without the intervention of a jury; no material error of law appears, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Bainbridge— Judge Spooner. August' 16, 1915.

W. V. Ouster, for plaintiff in error. M. E. O’Neal, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI