Martin v. State

86 S.E. 945, 17 Ga. App. 372, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 425
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 19, 1915·No. 6871·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. The uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice is sufficient to convict in- a misdemeanor case. Penal Code (1910), § 1017; Parsons v. State, 43 Ga. 197; Crisson v. State, 51 Ga. 597; Porter v. State, 76 Ga. 658; Rountree v. State, 88 Ga. 457 (14 S. E. 712); Stone v. State, 118 Ga. 705 (5), 713 (45 S. E. 630, 98 Am. St. R. 145); Gamble v. State, 4 Ga. App. 845 (62 S. E. 544); Brooks v. State, 12 Ga. App. 693 (78 S. E. 143).

2. The evidence authorized the judgment of the court, sitting without the intervention of a jury; no material error of law appears, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Bainbridge— Judge Spooner. August' 16, 1915. W. V. Ouster, for plaintiff in error. M. E. O’Neal, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 86 S.E. 945, 17 Ga. App. 372, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 425 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

86 S.E. 945 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

C. C. R. v. State
145 Ga. App. 27 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Drummond v. State
73 S.E.2d 43 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Branch v. State
166 S.E. 685 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)