Martin v. State
85 So. 42, 17 Ala. App. 310, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 9
Opinion
We'have carefully read and considered the evidence in this case as disclosed by the record, and, while the corpus delicti is proven beyond a reasonable doubt, there is not the slightest legal evidence connecting the defendant with the commission of the crime as charged. The general charge as requested by the defendant should have been given, and for this error the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. State, 85 So. 42, 17 Ala. App. 310, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 9 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).
85 So. 42 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. State
85 So. 42 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1920)