Martin v. SMG

747 N.W.2d 261, 480 Mich. 1192

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. SMG. Read the opinion of the Court — 480 Mich. 1043 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 28, 2008·No. 134358·Published

Opinion

747 N.W.2d 261 (2008)

James MARTIN and Lucia Martin, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
SMG, Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Grand Rapids-Kent County Convention Area Authority, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Grand Rapids Ballet Company, d/b/a Grand Rapids Ballet, Third-Party Defendant.

Docket No. 134358. COA No. 273528.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 28, 2008.

*262 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's January 30, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

747 N.W.2d 261 (2008)

James MARTIN and Lucia Martin, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
SMG, Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Grand Rapids-Kent County Convention Area Authority, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Grand Rapids Ballet Company, d/b/a Grand Rapids Ballet, Third-Party Defendant.

Docket No. 134358. COA No. 273528.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 28, 2008.

*262 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's January 30, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Martin v. SMG, 747 N.W.2d 261, 480 Mich. 1192 (Mich. 2008).

Pincite

747 N.W.2d 261 (Martin v. SMG) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.