Martin v. SMG
This text of 743 N.W.2d 877 (Martin v. SMG) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James MARTIN and Lucia Martin, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
SMG, Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Grand Rapids-Kent County Convention Area Authority, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Grand Rapids Ballet Company, d/b/a Grand Rapids Ballet, Third-Party Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion, and we REMAND this case to the Kent Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
743 N.W.2d 877, 480 Mich. 1043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-smg-mich-2008.