Martin v. J. Lichtman & Sons
This text of 199 A.2d 241 (Martin v. J. Lichtman & Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SOLOMON MARTIN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
J. LICHTMAN & SONS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
*86 Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Edward J. Abromson argued the cause for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Gaulkin in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR and SCHETTINO 5.
For reversal Justices HALL and HANEMAN 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 A.2d 241, 42 N.J. 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-j-lichtman-sons-nj-1964.