Martin v. J. Lichtman & Sons

199 A.2d 241, 42 N.J. 81
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 6, 1964·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

42 N.J. 81 (1964)
199 A.2d 241

SOLOMON MARTIN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
J. LICHTMAN & SONS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 17, 1964.
Decided April 6, 1964.

*86 Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Edward J. Abromson argued the cause for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Gaulkin in the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR and SCHETTINO — 5.

For reversal — Justices HALL and HANEMAN — 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. J. Lichtman & Sons, 199 A.2d 241, 42 N.J. 81 (N.J. 1964).

199 A.2d 241 (Martin v. J. Lichtman & Sons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D.A. v. FINISH LINE, INC.
D. New Jersey, 2022
Shaw v. Dutton Berry Farm
632 A.2d 18 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1993)
Cremen v. Harrah's Marina Hotel Casino
680 F. Supp. 150 (D. New Jersey, 1988)
Wyatt v. Metropolitan Maintenance Company
376 A.2d 1222 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1977)
LaBonte v. National Gypsum Co.
269 A.2d 634 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1970)
Fantasia v. Hess Oil and Chemical Corp.
265 A.2d 565 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
Brannum v. Spring Lakes Country Club, Inc.
455 P.2d 546 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1969)