Martin v. Holland

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1393

BILLY G. MARTIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL HOLLAND, Trustee; JOSEPH P. BRENNAN, Trustee; MARTY D. HUDSON, Trustee; B. V. HYLER, Trustee; Trustees of the 1974 Pension Plan,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-72)

Submitted: November 22, 2006 Decided: April 6, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger W. Rutherford, WOLFE, WILLIAMS & RUTHERFORD, Norton, Virginia, for Appellant. Glenda S. Finch, Deputy General Counsel, Carolyn O. Dutrow, Assistant General Counsel, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Billy G. Martin appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint alleging a violation of the Employee

Retirement Income Security Act. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Martin v. Holland, No. CA-04-72

(W.D. Va. Mar. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -