Martin v. Holland

Fourth Circuit

Martin v. Holland

223 F. App'x 268

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2007·No. No. 05-1393·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Billy G. Martin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint alleging a violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Holland, No. CA-04-72 (W.D.Va. Mar. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Billy G. Martin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint alleging a violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Holland, No. CA-04-72 (W.D.Va. Mar. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Martin v. Holland, 223 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

223 F. App'x 268 (Martin v. Holland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.