Martin v. Hobbs

Missouri Court of Appeals

Martin v. Hobbs

202 S.W.3d 92, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1476

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 3, 2006·No. No. ED 87120·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Former wife appeals from a judgment of the trial court entered on the parties’ cross motions to modify the child visitation, custody, and support awards in a decree of dissolution. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and [93]*93restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Former wife appeals from a judgment of the trial court entered on the parties’ cross motions to modify the child visitation, custody, and support awards in a decree of dissolution. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and [93]*93restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Martin v. Hobbs, 202 S.W.3d 92, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1476 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

202 S.W.3d 92 (Martin v. Hobbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related