In Re Marriage of Martin
This text of 202 S.W.3d 92 (In Re Marriage of Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Marriage of James Martin and Carol Ann Hobbs
JAMES MARTIN, Petitioner/Respondent,
v.
CAROL ANN HOBBS, Respondent/Appellant.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
James D. Burlison, McIlroy and Millan Troy, Missouri, for respondent.
Benicia Baker-Livorsi, The Family Law Group LLC, St. Charles, Missouri, for appellant.
Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J., and Sherri B. Sullivan, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Former wife appeals from a judgment of the trial court entered on the parties' cross motions to modify the child visitation, custody, and support awards in a decree of dissolution. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 S.W.3d 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marriage-of-martin-moctapp-2006.