Martin v. City of Tigard

714 P.2d 1115, 78 Or. App. 181
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 26, 1986
Docket84-0517C; CA A33250
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 714 P.2d 1115 (Martin v. City of Tigard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. City of Tigard, 714 P.2d 1115, 78 Or. App. 181 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment on a writ of review brought to challenge the city’s formation of a local improvement district (LID) for the construction of a public street and the city’s assessments levied for that purpose. We find no merit to plaintiffs’ particular challenges to the formation of the LID. The parties concede, however, that a portion of the planned improvement1 is not within the legal boundaries of the LID and that, therefore, the cost of constructing that portion cannot lawfully be included in the assessment. We agree. See ORS 223.389.

When a defect in an LID assessment occurs, the city council may reassess for up to the full cost of the improvement within the district. ORS 223.410; Heritage Square Dev. v. City of Sandy, 58 Or App 485, 493, 648 P2d 1317, rev den 293 Or 653, 653 P2d 998 (1982). We therefore set aside the original assessment as void and remand.

Assessment held void; remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. City of Tigard
52 P.3d 1074 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)
Martin v. State Ex Rel. Oregon Department of Transportation
857 P.2d 225 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
714 P.2d 1115, 78 Or. App. 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-city-of-tigard-orctapp-1986.