Martin v. City of New Orleans
This text of 409 U.S. 944 (Martin v. City of New Orleans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from Sup. Ct. La. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Gooding v. Wilson, 405 U. S. 518 (1972). See Lewis v. City of New Orleans, 408 U. S. 913 (1972). The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Blackmun, and Mr. Justice Rehnquist dissent for the reasons expressed in the several opinions in Rosenfeld v. New Jersey, 408 U. S. 901 (1972); Lewis v. City of New Orleans, supra; and Brown v. Oklahoma, 408 U. S. 914 (1972). Mr. Justice Powell would remand cause for further consideration only in light of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U. S. 568 (1942). See concurring opinion in Lewis v. City of New Orleans, supra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
409 U.S. 944, 93 S. Ct. 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-city-of-new-orleans-scotus-1972.