Martin v. City of McFarland

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: April 29, 2025
• Docket: 1:25-cv-00483
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CORDERO ANTHONY MARIN, Case No. 1:25-cv-00483-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA 13 v. PAUPERIS

14 CITY OF MCFARLAND, et al., (Doc. 2)

15 Defendants.

17 18 Plaintiff Cordero Anthony Marin (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this civil action on 19 April 28, 2025. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff has not paid the $405.00 filing fee and submitted a motion to 20 proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2). 21 The Court may authorize the commencement of an action without prepayment of fees “by 22 a person who submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such [person] possesses 23 [and] that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 24 Here, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s application (Doc. 2) and finds the requirements of 28 25 U.S.C. § 1915(a) are satisfied. 26 As to the status of Plaintiff’s complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Court is 27 authorized to conduct an initial review of all pro se complaints where the plaintiff proceeds in 28 forma pauperis to determine whether the complaint is legally sufficient under the applicable 1 || pleading standards. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (“section 1915(e) 2 || applies to all in forma pauperis complaints, not just those filed by prisoners”). The Court must 3 | dismiss a complaint, or portion thereof, if the Court determines that the complaint is legally 4 | frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary 5 || relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). If the Court 6 | determines that the complaint fails to state a claim, leave to amend may be granted to the extent 7 || that the deficiencies in the complaint can be cured by amendment. 8 Plaintiffs complaint will be screened in due course. Given the tremendous case backlog 9 | experienced by all judges in the Eastern District of California, delays are inevitable. If 10 || appropriate after the case has been screened, the Clerk of the Court will provide Plaintiff with the 11 || requisite forms and instructions to request the assistance of the United States Marshal in serving 12 || Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. 13 | Conclusion and Order 14 Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 15 || Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint 16 || will be screened in due course. 17 | ITIS SO ORDERED. 'S | Dated: _ April 29, 2025 | hr 19 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28