Martin v. Aston

60 Cal. 63, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 396
California Supreme Court·Decided January 20, 1882·No. No. 8,070·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The Court:

Under the Charter of the City of Santa Cruz (Stat. 1875-[69]*691876, p. 189, etc.), the Common Council of the city has power to lay out and improve streets within the city, and to raise money therefor by assessment and taxation. The Court below found that all the streets and alleys within the city limits are wholly maintained, improved, and kept in repair by the city. Therefore, according to Section 2664, Political Code, the appellant had no authority to collect taxes for road purposes from inhabitants of or property within the city.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Aston, 60 Cal. 63, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 396 (Cal. 1882).

60 Cal. 63 (Martin v. Aston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Benjamin Kohn v. State Bar of California
87 F.4th 1021 (Ninth Circuit, 2023)
Miller v. County of Kern
70 P. 549 (California Supreme Court, 1902)
Board of Commissioners v. Owen
7 Colo. 467 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1884)