Martin v. Anderson
6 Va. 19
Opinion
August 21.
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case differs from Tomlin’s adm’r v. How’s adm’r, Gilm. 1, in this, that no good reason appears upon the record, why the additional plea of the Act of Limitations was not sooner tendered.
The Judgment should be affirmed.
The President and Judge Coadter, absent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. Anderson, 6 Va. 19 (Va. 1827).
6 Va. 19 (Martin v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.