Martin v. Anderson
27 Va. 18
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case differs from Tomlin’s adm'r. v. 1 Taw’s adm’r. (rihn, 1, m this, that no good reason appears upon Ihe record, why the additional' plea of the Act of Limitations .yan no* sponer tendered.
Judgment should be affirmed. ' ;
The Presidevt and ,Tildare Goaxter absent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. Anderson, 27 Va. 18 (Va. 1827).
27 Va. 18 (Martin v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.