Martin Bros. v. Fruehauf Corp.

161 N.W.2d 767, 11 Mich. App. 573, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1330
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 31, 1968
DocketDocket No. 2,867
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 161 N.W.2d 767 (Martin Bros. v. Fruehauf Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin Bros. v. Fruehauf Corp., 161 N.W.2d 767, 11 Mich. App. 573, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1330 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial judge found that load imbalance rather than defective design caused the trailer sold by the defendant to the plaintiff Martin Brothers Mill & Foundry Supply Company to tip over.

We have examined the record and conclude that such finding was not clearly erroneous. GrCR 1963, 517.1. That finding precludes recovery oh plaintiffs’ implied warranty as well as on their negligence counts. Piercefield v. Remington Arms Company, Inc. (1965), 375 Mich 85, 98; Prosser, Torts (3d ed), p 683,n 63.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

Levin, P. J., and Burns and Dalton, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Global Truck & Equipment Co. v. Palmer MacHine Works, Inc.
628 F. Supp. 641 (N.D. Mississippi, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 N.W.2d 767, 11 Mich. App. 573, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-bros-v-fruehauf-corp-michctapp-1968.